Legal Opinion

Karahlanian v. Hadshian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1927No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action on a judgment obtained by them in California against defendants Manoog and Miron Hadshian and at the same time garnisheed the defendant bank. David Hadshian, an older brother of Manoog and Miron, was made an interpleading defendant, as claimant of the funds in the garnishment proceeding. The bank filed disclosure of an indebtedness of $6,000 on a savings account in one of its branches standing in the name of David Hadshian. Written interrogatories to the bank were filed and answered, and a statutory issue framed as to the ownership of that fund at the time when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Luckhurst v. SchroederMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Simmer v. Cutter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slinkard v. National MacHine & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Daigle v. BerkowitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Krzywosz v. CrummettMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API