Legal Opinion

Daigle v. Berkowitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1935No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 38,312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The defendant is the owner of a two-story building in Detroit, the first floor being occupied by stores and the second story by apartments. The defendant had hired a Mrs. Bevan as caretaker of the apartment. She and her husband occupied a three-room apartment, one room of which was rented to plaintiff for the sum of $3 per week with the privilege of getting her own meals in their kitchen.

There were several other apartments on the same floor of the building which were reached by a stairway that led down to the street entrance. The hallway adjacent to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McDonald v. Champion Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Diver v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Crippen v. HopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tinkler v. RichterMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Jorgensen v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Samuelson v. Olson Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API