Legal Opinion

Claim of Gould v. Champeney & Turk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On January 30, 1926, claimant received an injury in the course of and arising out of his employment, which caused one hundred per cent loss of use of the left eye. Notice of the injury and loss was given at once to both the employer and the carrier and a C-2 was prepared by the employer on February 2, 1926, but not filed with the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation until February 6, 1936. Claimant received medical and hospital treatment, for which payment was made by the insurance carrier; he was also disabled and prevented from working for six weeks, during which time his full wages were paid,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Seely v. Phœnix Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maxey v. Fremont Department of UtilitiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gugler v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API