Legal Opinion

Guignard Brick Works v. Gantt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 27, 1968No. 18764PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the appellant Guignard has a valid mechanic’s lien upon real property of the respondent Gantt by virtue of Sec. 45-251 of the 1962 Code of Laws. Appeal is from an order of the circuit court, confirming the report o,f the Master, and holding that Guignard did not have a valid lien.

The facts of the case are relatively simple. Respondent Gantt entered into a contract with Van Builders, Inc. (which for brevity we shall refer to simply as Van), to construct a residence upon property of Gantt, the total contract price for labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Rapid Fireproof Door Co. v. Largo Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Metz v. CritcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George A. Z. Johnson, Jr., Inc. v. BarnhillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Clo-Car Trucking Co. v. Clifflure Estates of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Southern Pole Buildings, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. F & D Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Powder Coaters, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Rice & Santos, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API