Guignard Brick Works v. Gantt
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice.
The sole question involved in this appeal is whether the appellant Guignard has a valid mechanic’s lien upon real property of the respondent Gantt by virtue of Sec. 45-251 of the 1962 Code of Laws. Appeal is from an order of the circuit court, confirming the report o,f the Master, and holding that Guignard did not have a valid lien.
The facts of the case are relatively simple. Respondent Gantt entered into a contract with Van Builders, Inc. (which for brevity we shall refer to simply as Van), to construct a residence upon property of Gantt, the total contract price for labor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Rapid Fireproof Door Co. v. Largo Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Metz v. CritcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- George A. Z. Johnson, Jr., Inc. v. BarnhillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Clo-Car Trucking Co. v. Clifflure Estates of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Southern Pole Buildings, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- F & D Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Powder Coaters, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Rice & Santos, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.