Hursey v. Marty
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants John G-. Nelson and August Booren from a judgment of the municipal court of Stillwater, entered in pursuance of an order for judgment by Jack, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action upon an official bond executed by defendant Marty as principal and the other defendants as sureties, conditioned that Marty should “well and faithfully in all things perform and execute the duties of sheriff according to law during his continuance in office, without fraud, deceit, or oppression.” The complaint, which is unnecessarily long, is very far from being a model pleading, being quite prolix on immaterial matters, but very scant in its allegations of material facts. But, as there must be a reversal on points that go to the merits of the case, we will not consider…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lammon v. FeusierSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People Ex Rel. Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Turner v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Gerber v. AckleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanson v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hall v. TierneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Wilson v. LowryArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- County of Mower v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916