Legal Opinion

Murray v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 5, 1975No. 26788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This original proceeding seeks relief in the nature of prohibition pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.

The primary issue is whether the petitioners are entitled to a jury trial. This proceeding seeks to prohibit the trial judge from proceeding to trial without a jury. In our view, the petitioners were not entitled to a jury trial on the factual issues which are now presented in this case. C.R.C.P. 38(a) and (b).

The history behind this civil action and a review of the record forces us to conclude that the request for a jury trial was properly denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Setchell v. DellacroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Rupp v. CoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Scofield v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Benster v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Variance BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Variance BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API