Legal Opinion
Nadler v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 6, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-1586-OGPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA” or “the Act”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). On March 30, 1989, this Court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ordering the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) to adjudicate plaintiff’s application for adjustment of status within thirty days. Although defendants concede that plaintiff is a prevailing party to this litigation, they argue that attorneys fees are not warranted because defendants’ position was “substantially…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mary Jane Ruderman Hirschey v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Long Lake Energy Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Lee v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Ava P. Trahan v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stewart v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
- National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Douglas v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Harriott v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.