Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Baker
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 16, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GASCH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), 1 the government’s opposition, and the numerous replies and counter-replies which have been filed pursuant thereto. On April 24, 1991, this Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a declaration that they are citizens of the United States; however, the Court denied plain tiffs’ request for a writ of mandamus compelling the government to issue passports to plaintiffs. There is no dispute that plaintiffs have prevailed on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lucas v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Sandoval v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Shu Chen v. SlatteryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.