Legal Opinion

Doullut v. Rush

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 29, 1917No. 22689PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Action by M. P. Doullut and others against Mary Rush and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and, a suspensive apipeal having been granted, plaintiffs pray for certiorari to review that ruling.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, O. J.

Relators obtained a judgment ordering the ejection of defendants, for nonpayment of rent, from certain premises, alleged to have been leased to them, and, a suspensive appeal having been granted therefrom, they invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this court for the review and reversal of that ruling. The facts disclosed by the record are as follows:

Plaintiffs brought their action in ejectment in May, 1917, alleging that in November, 1916, they had leased the premises in question to defendants, by notarial act, for 22 months, at a rental payable monthly in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Audubon Hotel Co. v. BraunigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. Pelletier v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Slocomb v. RobertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  4. Saint v. MartelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Lamouraine v. Judge of Division "B," Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Byrd v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Bohanon v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Sherer-Gillett Co. v. PilsburyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  4. Brunies v. MorletLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Church v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API