Legal Opinion

Saint v. Martel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 25, 1910No. 17,981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Saint Mary; Charles L. Wise, Judge ad hoe. Action by Percy Saint against J. Sully Martel. Judgment for defendant, and plain- • tiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment maintaining defendant’s exception of lis pendens. It appears that in April, 1907, he brought a suit in the same court against the same defendant, in which he alleged that he had purchased from one Brown, who had acquired from defendant, an undivided one-tenth interest in defendant’s one-half of one-fifth interest in the Jennings oil field, but that defendant remained in possession and refused to deliver to him the interest so acquired; that the interest so held by defendant in part of said field, to wit, the Arnaudet…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martel v. Jennings-Heywood Oil SyndicateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Saint v. MartelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Dick v. GilmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
  4. City Bank of New Orleans v. WaldenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
  5. Ingram v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doullut v. RushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Federal Ins. Co. v. TL James & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Lorio v. GladneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Weems v. MoiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. DenisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API