Legal Opinion

Gedmin v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 18, 1967No. Gen. 50,427PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the court.

In a declaratory judgment action, the trial court entered an order declaring invalid and restraining enforcement of defendant’s Zoning Ordinance insofar as it presently classifies plaintiffs’ property as “R-2” and “R-3” and thereby prevents development of the subject property within the “R-4” classification. Defendant appeals, contending: (a) plaintiffs failed to adduce clear and convincing proof that the ordinance is invalid as applied to the subject property; (b) the surrounding uses being of paramount importance, the subject…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fiore v. City of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Urann v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Elmhurst National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Lapkus Builders, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chicago & NW Ry. Co. v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Littlestone Co. v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Park RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Fay v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Petersen v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API