Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Judd

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

SUBMISSION OE CASE WITHOUT SUIT. These cases were submitted under the statute. The plaintiff, Bishop, owed a mortgage on his real estate in Honolulu, and was also the owner of S5,000 stock in a corporation whose entire property is on Maui, and is there assessed. The plaintiff, Armstrong, is the owner of a mortgage and note on real estate in Honolulu.

Read the full summary

SUBMISSION OE CASE WITHOUT SUIT. These cases were submitted under the statute. The plaintiff, Bishop, owed a mortgage on his real estate in Honolulu, and was also the owner of S5,000 stock in a corporation whose entire property is on Maui, and is there assessed. The plaintiff, Armstrong, is the owner of a mortgage and note on real estate in Honolulu. The defendant assessed the plaintiff, Bishop, the full value of his real estate without deducting the amount of the mortgage, and assessed him also on his stock in said corporation. The defendant further assessed the plaintiff, Armstrong, on her…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McCully, J.

The above title embodies two separate submissions argued by the same counsel at the same time, respectively as follows:

“1. The plaintiff', Bishop, is the owner of real estate in the District of Honolulu, which estate is subject to'mortgage for «$650 to Mrs. L. B. Coan.
“2. The plaintiff'is also the holder of three shares in the capital stock of the ‘ Haiku Plantation,’ a corporation carrying on business at Iiaiku, in the Island of Maui, the value of such shares,.for the purposes of this case, being taken to be $5,000.
“ 3. The plaintiff' has made a return to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bolton v. . AlbertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. People Ex Rel. Burrows v. Supervisors of Orange CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Warner & Ray v. BeersCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
  4. Adams v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re the Claim of Mott-SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gunzaga v. Kaiwiki Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. TerritoryHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kahua Ranch, Ltd. v. HustaceHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API