United States v. H. M. Young Associates, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Market, Chief Judge.
The United States appeals from the judgment1 of the Customs Court which granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denied appellant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, 69 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 4388, 349 F. Supp. 1007 (1972). We affirm.
The imported merchandise consists of elastic fabric, described as “COTTON TISSUES (Waistband-Elastic).” The importer, H. M. Young Associates, Inc., of New York, purchased the subject merchandise from the manufacturer, HCH Kalbskopf of West Germany, in 1965 at an invoiced price of 62 cents per yard F.O.B., and the merchandise was so…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
- Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.