Legal Opinion
Seidel v. Panella
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 21, 1989No. 116, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISCHER, Judge.
This case revives the adage that there exist only two requirements in life, one of which is the payment of taxes. Appellants’ failure to fulfill this obligation triggered the controversy we are now asked to resolve. At issue is the validity of a final decree entered by the Circuit Court for Worcester County foreclosing appellants’ right of redemption on certain tax sale property.
The subject property is lot 1055 located in Montego Bay Mobile Home Park and is improved by a mobile home. 1 Appellants, Robert J. Seidel and Jessie Howard Armentrout, two brothers-in-law who are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Unnamed Attorney v. Attorney Grievance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Haskell v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Jannenga v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Lowman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manikhi v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. LorkovicCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Slattery v. FriedmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Kennedy v. CummingsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Smith v. LawlerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992