Legal Opinion
Raymond Edward Bailey v. Curtis W. Tarr, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1972No. 72-1225PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is brought by Selective Service registrants who were ordered to report for induction into the Armed Forces of the United States during the period September 28, 1971, and December 27, 1971. The complaint was filed below on behalf of the named appellants and all those similarly situated, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The class is defined as “ . . . each and every Selective Service registrant registered with a California local board located within this district (Central District of California) who since September 28, 1971, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Farrell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brothers v. First LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Herscher v. State, Department of CommerceAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- McGrew v. TarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- No. 82-4584Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Robert E. McGrew v. Curtis W. Tarr, Director Selective Service System, Frank M. Valdez, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Selective Service Registrants Similarly Situated v. California Selective Service Local Board No. 44, Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of the Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972