Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Farrell v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

In error. Argued at November Term, 1891, before Beasley, Chief Justice, and Justices Depue and Van Syckel.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Mercer County Quarter Sessions upon an indictment of which the following is a copy:

*422 “Mercer Oyer and Terminer and General Jail Delivery,

“October Term, 1891.
“ Mercer County, to wit — The grand inquest of the State of' : New Jersey, in and for the body of the county of Mercer,, upon their respective oath—
“ Present, That John Farrell, late of the city of Trenton, in the said county of Mercer, on the first day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety, with force and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. People ex rel. Parsons v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Conrad v. NallMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. McClure v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. State Street Trust Co. v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Baille v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Barnaby v. Bradley & Currier Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API