Legal Opinion
McGrew v. Tarr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1972No. Nos. 71-2925, 71-2914PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In each of these cases the appellant below sought an injunction restraining the defendants from enforcing his induction into the armed services. They were consolidated and upon consideration the court rendered its Memorandum Decision denying injunctive relief. These separate appeals are from that order. We affirm in each case.
Appellants contend that certain 1971 amendments to the Selective Service Act1 reenact section 20 of the Military Selective Service Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C. App. § 470, so that the ninety-day moratorium of section 20 is also applicable under the 1971 amendments. Appellants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Raymond Edward Bailey v. Curtis W. Tarr, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Lawrence E. Doyle v. Massachusetts Local Board No. 72Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DolingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Robert E. McGrew v. Curtis W. Tarr, Director Selective Service System, Frank M. Valdez, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Selective Service Registrants Similarly Situated v. California Selective Service Local Board No. 44, Curtis W. Tarr, National Director of the Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972