Legal Opinion
United States v. Bradshaw
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 15, 1981No. Civ. JH-79-2118PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOWARD, District Judge.
This action was brought by the United States against Defendant Quinton R. Bradshaw because he allegedly placed fill material on wetlands without a permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers in violation of Sections 301(a) and 404(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“FWPCA”), as amended, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 1344(a). The United States seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief. The Court’s jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1345. A court trial was held on May 6, 1981; the following are the Court’s findings of fact and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Sexton Cove Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. WeismanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
- United States v. AlleyneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. John Pozsgai, Gizella Pozsgai, Mercer Wrecking & Recycling Corporation, J. Vinch & Sons, Inc. John Pozsgai and Gizella PozsgaiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- United States v. TullDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- United States v. Cumberland Farms of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- Monongahela Power Co. v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.