Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Capital Transit Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 17, 1955No. 12259_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its June 16, 1953 order, requiring Capital Transit Company, a public transportation utility, to bargain collectively with a union 1 2 which the Board had certified as exclusive bargaining representative for certain designated employees. The Company challenges the certification on two grounds: (1) it was based upon an invalid election, and (2) the Board included “supervisors” within the bargaining unit.
Section 9(c) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act forbids an election within twelve months of an earlier “valid…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Quincy Steel Casting Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Security Guard Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc. Ecology Action Club Sandra Silver Gordon Silver Elizabeth Apfelberg and John J. Forster v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor. George Deukmejian, Governor of the State of California v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.