Legal Opinion

Ledbetter v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1889No. 13,823PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— The appellants insist that a written lease is the foundation of the complaint, and that as it is not incorporated in the pleading or filed as an exhibit, the complaint is bad. The appellants are in error in asserting that the instrument is not filed and referred to in the pleading. It is averred that a written lease was executed, that a copy of it is filed marked exhibit “A,” and a copy thus designated is set forth in the record. This is sufficient. Straughan v. Fairchild, 80 Ind. 598; Whitworth v. Malcomb, 82 Ind. 454; Northwestern, etc., Co. v. Hazelett, 105 Ind. 212.

Where a written…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Jones v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. West v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hochstedler v. HochstedlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Carrell v. EllingwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Cawston v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Backer v. PyneIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API