Legal Opinion

Whitmer v. Sullivent

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 1, 2008No. 07-419PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

By certification memorandum dated April 2, 2008, the Arkansas Court of Appeals certified the question of whether an attorney, who is also a prosecutor, should be disqualified from representing a parent in a change-of-custody suit when criminal charges are brought by the prosecuting attorney’s office against the other parent’s current spouse. We hold that disqualification is not required because there is not a direct conflict of interest nor is this a case of dual representation, and we remand to the court of appeals for further action.

On August 5, 2002, Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Weigel v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Craig v. CarrigoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. State, Office of Child Support Enforcement v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Betts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Stacks v. StacksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Darren Taylor v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  4. Darren Taylor v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
  5. Harrelson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API