Legal Opinion
Mays v. Newlin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia
Decided January 25, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
At Law. On motion to quash attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWELL, District Judge.
This is an action at law commenced in the corporation court of the city of Lynchburg, and removed to this court, on the ground of the nonresidence of the defendant. Process was issued on April 5, 1905, returnable to the May rules. The defendant, conceded to be a citizen and resident of Pennsylvania, was found and served with process in due time in this state. At the May rules (held April 2i, 1905) the declaration was filed, and the defendant filed in the office of the clerk of the corporation court a petition for removal and a' bond, subsequently adjudged to be in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kinne v. LantU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895
- Miller v. TobinUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
- Skipwith's ex'or v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1837
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. New York, P. & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Lee v. Continental Ins.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1923
- Bahls v. Welfare Loan Soc. of La FayetteDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1927