San Francisco Labor Council v. Regents of University of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
Plaintiffs petitioned the superior court for writ of mandate to compel the Regents of the University of California to fix minimum salary rates for certain employees at or above the prevailing wage rates in various localities in accordance with Education Code section 92611. The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend on ground the statute conflicts with article IX, section 9 of the California Constitution. Plaintiffs appeal from judgment of dismissal. The judgment must be affirmed.
Education Code section 92611 provides: “The minimum and maximum salary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of VistaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.