prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,260 Lora Lohr, Michael Lohr, Her Husband v. Medtronic, Inc., a Foreign Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
In this case we must decide whether the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA or Act), 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 360c-360¿ (West Supp.1994) preempt Appellants’ state law negligent design, negligent manufacture, failure to warn, and strict liability claims against the manufacturer of an allegedly defective pacemaker. The district court found that they did and dismissed the entire action. We hold that Appellants’ negligent manufacture and failure to warn claims are preempted and affirm their dismissal. We also hold that Appellants’ negligent design and strict liabili ty claims are…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Goodlin v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Charlotte Kennedy and Robert L. Kennedy v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Talbott v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Barbara Mitchell and Gregory Mitchell v. Collagen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.