Legal Opinion

Kleybolte v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the CourtHosea, J.

Heard on demurrer to cross-petition.

To a petition declaring upon promissory notes of the defendant to the amount of forty thousand dollars, the defendant files a cross-petition alleging that on July 7, 1904, It was the owner of thirty-three hundred $1,000 bonds, one of the obligors of which bonds was the Toledo Railway & Terminal Company; that said bonds were secured by mortgage to the Commonwealth Trust Company of St. Louis; and that payment of the principal and interest of said bonds was guaranteed by the defendant and by the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, jointly and severally; and that *39t…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Norden v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Fort Payne Rolling Mill v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API