Legal Opinion

State v. Singletary

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 841SC1067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress certain incriminating statements made immediately following a polygraph test administered to him by SBI Agent William Godley, after the machine had been turned off. Defendant makes a twofold argument in this regard. First, defendant contends that pursuant to the decision of our Supreme Court in State v. Grier, 307 N.C. 628, 300 S.E. 2d 351 (1983), all evidence obtained during a polygraph test can no longer be introduced into evidence, including evidence obtained during the “post-test…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. King v. DemoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. ArmisteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cosme v. MarchandSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  2. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. TalfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. BaconCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API