Legal Opinion
Michael Shroder v. Suburban Coastal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 16, 1984No. 82-6086PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this Truth-in-Lending Act case we examine the provisions of a Truth-in-Lending disclosure statement to determine whether it is deficient under the Act and regulations. We find it deficient and reverse and remand the case.
Background
On October 7, 1980, Michael Shroder, Susan Shroder, and Gregory Pillon, individually and as representatives of a class, brought this action alleging that Suburban Coastal Corporation (Suburban Coastal) had violated four provisions of the TILA and Regulation Z.
Suburban Coastal is a New Jersey corporation in the business of making purchase…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Cornelius Cooper v. Southern CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Andrews v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.