Heiman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Johnny Albert Heiman, was convicted of indecency with a child, enhanced by two prior felony convictions. After the jury found appellant guilty, the trial court found the enhancements true and assessed punishment at 30 years confinement. We affirm.
The complainant, who was 16 years old at the time of the offense, is appellant’s daughter. She testified that she lived with her mother and her physically-abusive stepfather. As a result of the abuse, the complainant left home to stay with friends. During this time, the complainant abused drugs and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Howland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Troy Williams II v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Batiste v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Hartson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.