Harron v. Harron
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, made after final judgment of divorce directing the payment of counsel fees and costs, to enable the plaintiff to contest a motion for new trial. George H. Bahrs, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, John S. Drum, and Sidney M. Ehrman, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order made after final judgment, requiring defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of one hundred dollars for counsel fees and forty dollars as costs, to enable her to contest the motion' for a new trial. The right to prosecute this appeal may not now be denied. (Harron v. Harron, 123 Cal. 508.)
Plaintiff had instituted an action for divorce against defendant. The fact of their marriage relations was in issue. After trial, the court found them to be husband and wife, and granted the divorce as prayed for. From that judgment the defendant appealed. Defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Newlands v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Sierra Union Water & Mining Co. v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Benton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.