Legal Opinion

(PC) Blackwell v. Jenkins

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00442Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL, No. 2:19-cv-0442 TLN DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 A. JENKINS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. 19 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint for screening. (ECF No. 22.) For 20 the reasons set forth below, the court will give plaintiff the option to proceed with the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API