Legal Opinion

Smith v. Denaburg

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1969No. 6 Div. 266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

The respondent appeals from a decree for complainant in a suit to set aside a conveyance of real estate which had been made to respondent as hereinafter described.

Complainant is the trustee of the bankrupt estate of James H. Smith. Respondent is the former wife of Smith. Complainant avers that on and prior to July 9, 1964, Smith was indebted to various creditors and “that at said time, he was insolvent” and his insolvent condition was known to his wife, the respondent; that on July 9, 1964, Smith conveyed to respondent certain real estate, to wit, Lot 9, Block 2, according to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dixon Lumber Co. v. PeacockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Blum v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. McNally v. Emmetsburg National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Wrenn v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  2. Hill v. Quinlan (In Re Quinlan)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1981
  3. Tidwell v. Galbreath (In Re Galbreath)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API