Legal Opinion
Kahler v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01405Unknown
1Opinion
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 MICHAEL R. KAHLER, 9 Plaintiff, 10 Case No. 2:19-cv-01405-RAJ v. 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., 12 COMPLAINT Defendant. 13 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint. 17 Dkt. # 14. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 18 II. BACKGROUND 19 Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (“BCG”) is a form of immunotherapy used to treat 20 cancer. Dkt. # 11 at 2. In late 2016, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Marder v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.