Legal Opinion

Fox v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided November 19, 1984No. 84-2247-MBPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

McRAE, Chief Judge.

This is a product liability action, arising out of an incident in which plaintiff, while operating her automobile, suffered injuries as a result of a front-end collision. Plaintiff seeks to recover under theories of negligence, breach of implied warranty, strict liability in tort, and under the MagnusonMoss Federal Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 et seq. The cause came before this Court on a removal petition from the Circuit Court of Tennessee, filed by defendants on March 30, 1984.

This ruling pertains to two motions: defendant Regie Nationale des…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Appolonio v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sikhs for Justice v. NathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. IslipUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  5. In Re South African Apartheid LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API