Legal Opinion

State v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 2013No. CR9911591; A147269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

In this criminal case, we review the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion in limine to exclude eyewitness identification evidence. In denying the motion, the trial court determined that a pretrial photographic lineup was not unduly suggestive under the test set out in State v. Classen, 285 Or 221, 590 P2d 1198 (1979). Following the pretrial hearing, defendant entered a conditional guilty plea to public indecency, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion.

While this case was pending in this court, the Oregon Supreme Court decided State v. Lawson/James, 352…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. SarichOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. WesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. EngleJackson County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API