Legal Opinion

Gulden v. Department of the Army

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 25, 1981No. Appeal No. 19-80PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff in this civilian pay case, representing himself, initially sought review, under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111, (relevant sections codified at 5 U.S.C. §§ 1205, 2302, 4301, 7511-12, 7701, 7702), of an adverse determination by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) that it had no jurisdiction of his appeal. He later asked the court for a determination de novo. The Government asks us to dismiss the appeal and deny the request for a de novo determination, and if we consider the case, that we affirm the decision of the MSPB.

Plaintiff had a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. James W. Clinton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. McCallin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramon J. Martinez v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Al-Qaisi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API