Miller v. Jarman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The Millers brought this action against their neighbors, the Jarmans, seeking a permanent injunction against the Jarmans’ interference with an alleged easement for ingress and egress to and from the Millers’ garage.
The Millers claim they have established an easement by prescription over and across the Jarmans’ driveway which lies immediately north of the platted common boundary line of the parties. All the elements necessary to establish an easement by prescription were established except ad verse use. Roediger v. Cullen, 26 Wn.2d 690, 175 P.2d 669 (1946). The trial court found the use of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Cuillier v. CoffinWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Mayer's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by13 opinions
- Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Crites v. KochCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Federated American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Drake v. SmershCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Drake v. SmershCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.