Legal Opinion
Daher v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 1958No. 2213-2218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting. Judge.
Before us for review is an order denying a defendant’s motion to withdraw a plea of guilty in six cases of false pretenses involving bank checks.
The informations were filed September 24, 1957, and on arraignment the court appointed an attorney to represent defendant. After conferring with the attorney defendant entered a plea of guilty, the trial judge asked whether defendant understood the effect of what he was doing, and being satisfied that the guilty plea was a voluntary one, postponed sentence for one month and referred the case to the probation officer for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edward B. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Billie Frield SwaggertyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Futterman v. United States. Weisfeld v. United States. Maizel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Solomon McNair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosenau v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Curtis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Guest v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961