Legal Opinion

Futterman v. United States. Weisfeld v. United States. Maizel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 20, 1952No. 11516, 11517, 11518PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants were indicted for knowingly receiving stolen goods. Each pleaded not guilty and filed a motion to suppress evidence. Later, they withdrew these pleadings and filed pleas of guilty to one of the two counts of their indictments. After the imposition of sentences and the denial of motions to reduce, appellants replaced their counsel and filed motions for leave to withdraw their pleas of guilty under Rule 32(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., “to correct manifest injustice” 1 . These motions and supporting affidavits charged in substance that: (1) appellants…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Vincent L. Pilkington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  4. J. Paul Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. ParrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API