Legal Opinion

Curtis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1959No. 2263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant was adjudged to be the father of a child born out of wedlock in a paternity proceeding before the Juvenile Court in 1950. Almost eight years later, following an adjudication of contempt by the same court, appellant filed a motion to set aside his “plea of guilty” in the original proceeding and to vacate both that judgment and the subsequent judgment of contempt on the ground that he was without the benefit of counsel.

Curtis first appeared before the court on September 21, 1950, and acknowledged paternity of the child. The record of that hearing contains a printed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Bert Strand, Sheriff of San Diego County, State of California v. William SchmittrothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. United States v. Norstrand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Robert Edward Lipscomb v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Guest v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API