Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Martinez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 28, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York City Housing Authority, dated March 22, 2000, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner Patricia Lancaster’s “remaining family member” grievance.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the respondent New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter the Housing Authority) that the petitioner Patricia Lancaster (hereinafter the petitioner) is not a “remaining family…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Faison v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Barnhill v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Kolarick v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Powell v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roman v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hargrove v. Van Dyke HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York City Housing Authority Hammel Houses v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Torres v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008