Legal Opinion
Powell v. Franco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 26, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority, dated May 29, 1998, that petitioner is not entitled to occupancy of the subject public housing apartment as a remaining family member, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Barry Cozier, J.], entered August 11, 1999), dismissed, without costs.
Respondent’s finding that petitioner is not a “remaining family member,” as that term is defined in respondent’s Management Manual, is substantially supported…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kolarick v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ortiz v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Lancaster v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rentas v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Brooks v. Wagner HousesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kwan-Fong Fung v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.