Legal Opinion

In re Hurst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2007No. 48S00-0605-DI-162Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FINDING MISCONDUCT AND IMPOSING DISCIPLINE

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint against Respondent on May 1, 2006, and on June 30, 2006, Respondent filed an “Affidavit of Consent to Discipline,” admitting the charges in the complaint and consenting to discipline by this Court. The Court finds that the Respondent engaged in pro*969fessional misconduct and imposes discipline on Respondent.

Facts: On August 18, 2004, Respondent was convicted on a guilty plea of battery as a Class A misdemeanor. The victim, Respondent’s wife, suffered a laceration to her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Matter of McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API