Davis v. MacKay
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff, as assignee of Bert H. Franklin, sued to recover a sum of money alleged to be due from defendant for services rendered as a detective.
Judgment went for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.
As appears from the findings, the action was based upon a written contract dated November 1, 1918, executed between Bert H. Franklin of the first part and the persons whose names are signed thereto as parties of the second part, who at the time were attorneys for defendant in an action then pending in the superior court of Maricopa County, Arizona, wherein defendant was the proponent for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- People ex rel. Hamilton v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Porter v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Young v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tasker v. CochraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
- Cormac v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945