Legal Opinion

Gautam v. Conte

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 20, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Urmila Gautam and Narinder Gautam appeal from a post-judgment order of the Law Division that vacated a judgment against defendant Dominick P. Conte, Esq. (Conte) in this legal malpractice action. The pivotal issue raised by this appeal is whether Conte is entitled to the benefit of the judgment entered in favor of his codefendant Samuel R. De Luca, Esq. (De Luca) in Gautam v. De Luca, 215 N.J. Super. 388, 521 A.2d 1343 (App.Div.1987), even though he was not a party to the appeal.

*364The resolution of this issue is best…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Motor Club of America Insurance v. PhillipsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Gautam v. De LucaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Hartford Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. E & K Agency, Inc. v. Van DykeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Potter v. HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. PraissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Smid v. New Jersey Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API