Legal Opinion
Gautam v. De Luca
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 2, 1987PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
215 N.J. Super. 388 (1987)
521 A.2d 1343
URMILA GAUTAM AND NARINDER GAUTAM, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
SAMUEL R. DE LUCA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DOMINICK P. CONTE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted December 9, 1986.
Decided March 2, 1987.
Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and ASHBEY.
Nino F. Falcone, attorney for appellant Samuel R. De Luca (Donald R. Venezia and Nino F. Falcone, on the brief).
Marinari & Farkas, attorneys for respondents Urmila and Narinder Gautam (Robert A. Farkas, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.
This is an…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Douglas v. DelpTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Frazier v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- 2175 Lemoine Ave. v. Finco, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.