Legal Opinion
Anthony I. Craft v. Campbell Soup Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1998No. 98-15060PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge BRUNETTI.
2Per curiam
We must decide the threshold issue of whether we have jurisdiction to hear Campbell Soup Company’s (“Campbell Soup”) interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that appellate jurisdiction is lacking, we dismiss the appeal.
As there is no final judgment or any other applicable exception to the final judgment rule, this court has jurisdiction only if the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) applies. See 9 U.S.C. § 16 (providing for interlocutory appeal under the FAA). Our jurisdiction…
3Cases cited29 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Mary KOVELESKIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SBC CAPITAL MARKETS, INC. A/K/A SBC Warburg, Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Craft v. Campbell Soup Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.