Commonwealth v. Morgan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
In this appeal, Todd Morgan (“Appellant”) challenges his classification as a Sexually Violent Predator (“SVP”) pursuant to the provisions of Megan’s Law. 1 We affirm.
On June 23, 2010, Appellant entered a guilty plea to one count each of unauthorized administration of an intoxicant, criminal attempt to commit indecent assault, and sexual abuse of children. 2 That same day, the Honorable Paul M. Yatron, sitting as the trial court, conducted a hearing pursuant to Megan’s Law. Judge Yatron ably summarized the following pertinent facts relative to Appellant’s SVP status:
Appellan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. KrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FuentesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. PlucinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StephensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HollingsheadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HandfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ManahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Birney, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.