Commonwealth v. Krouse
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1 Frank Lee Krouse appeals from the judgment of sentence following his conviction for indecent assault and the trial court’s determination that he is a “sexually violent predator” (“SVP”) pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law II, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9791-9799. Megan’s Law II requires inter alia registration of an SVP’s address with the Pennsylvania State Police and community notification of the SVP’s ad*836dress for potentially the rest of the SVP’s life. Krouse asserts that the Commonwealth failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Krouse was an SVP. He also challenges the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- State v. EppingerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re FioriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. WestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. P.L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.