Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hanson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2011No. 25700, 25701PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Terry and Susan Brown purchased land adjacent to James Hanson. The neighbors signed a Common Well and Road Easement Agreement. The document was filed in the office of the Meade County Register of Deeds. Believing the Browns had breached the terms of the agreement, Hanson filed a letter “rescinding” the agreement with the register of deeds. The Browns filed a lawsuit. The trial court granted the Browns’ motion for partial summary judgment requesting declaratory judgment. On appeal, this Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that rescission was not the appropriate…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gambino v. Boulevard Mortgage Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Rorvig v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwab v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Healy Ranch v. HealySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Biegler v. KraftDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
  4. Interest of A.J.L.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jed Spectrum, Inc. v. StoakesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API