Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Pond

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2008No. 27847Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I concur except, respectfully, I believe that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) did gravely err (1) in affirming the decision of the Second Circuit Family Court (the court) to exclude, based on a purported violation of the notice provision in Hawai'i Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rule 404(b) (Supp.2007), evidence submitted by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kevin Pond (Petitioner) that the Complainant herein (Complainant) struck him prior to the incident in question; (2) in affirming the court’s decision to deny Petitioner’s request for a…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API